Marketing Report代写:是否补贴本地制造业

Marketing Report代写:是否补贴本地制造业

多年来，澳大利亚政府是否应该继续补贴本地制造业汽车一直是个有争议的问题。几年前，一些经济学家怀疑补贴的效率，有些人仍然主张保护政府（泰勒，2012）。一旦联邦反对党计划从汽车工业补贴中削减5亿美元，但后来他们考虑扭转这一计划，因为澳大利亚的政治共识是，纳税人补贴仍然需要保护其汽车工业（泰勒，2012）。

澳大利亚政府长期以来一直在补贴当地汽车工业，以保护国内产业，保障其人民的工作。然而，并非所有澳大利亚人都理解这一举措。有人认为，在不需要政府干预的情况下，市场需要自由高效地进行补贴，同时补贴政策也会产生挤出效应等问题。相反，仍有一些人主张此举。他们认为增加补贴可以保护国内就业和工业的多样化。此外，一些人将从汽车行业和当地工人等补贴中受益，而有些人则受到纳税人、政府以及外国汽车制造商等政策的影响。最后，建议减少或取消补贴，使市场能够自由发展，符合市场经济理论。

Marketing Report代写:是否补贴本地制造业

For years, there has been a controversial issue whether Australian government should continue subsidizing the local manufacturing car industry. Several years ago some economists doubted the efficiency of the subsidy, while some still advocated for the protection from government (Taylor, 2012). Once the federal opposition planned to cut $500 million from car industry subsidy, but later they considered reversing the plan due to Australian political consensus that taxpayer subsidy is still in need to protect its car industry (Taylor, 2012).

Australian government has been subsidizing the local car industry for a long time in order to protect its domestic industry and secure its people’ jobs. However, it is not all Australian who understand this move. Some argue that the subsidy should be decreased because the market needs to work freely and efficiently without government’s intervention and meanwhile the subsidy policy may bring some issues such as crowding-out effect. On the contrary, there are still some advocating the move. They believe that increasing subsidy can protect the domestic employment and the diversification of industry. In addition, some people will benefit from the subsidy such as the car industry and the local workers while some people suffer from the policy such as the taxpayers, government as well as the foreign car manufacturers. The author suggests in the end that the subsidy should be decreased or even canceled so that the market can develop freely by itself and accord to the market economic theory.